
By Desire Athow
Microsoft's decision to have a common operating system
blueprint that can run from an internet-of-thing device to a (super)
computer means that Windows 10 has been built from the ground up to run
comfortably on low-performance parts.
The fact that it
shares the same minimum hardware requirements as Windows Vista (at least
for the Premium experience) is a fantastic achievement but that's only
part of the story; Windows 10 actually runs better than its beleaguered
ancestor. Much better.
We tried an experiment at
TechRadar to see how low Windows 10 could go. I sourced the most ancient
(but probably not the slowest) processor that could run it. Microsoft
says that it needs to have at least a 1GHz clock rate with IA-32 or x64
architecture as well as support for NX bit, PAE, and SSE2.
![]() |
A CPUID view of the Mesh PC |
The oldest processor that fits the bill is the AMD Athlon 64
3200+, a part first introduced to the market in September 2003, 11 and a
half year ago. It's slow (about half the Passmark score of the
Baytrail-based Intel Atom Z3735G found in many entry level, sub-£100 tablets) but I chose not to underclock it.
The
computer that housed it is a Mesh computer, one that comes with an
Nvidia-powered Asus motherboard with onboard graphics, four 256MB DDR
memory modules, a 40GB hard disk drive, a DVD ROM drive and even a
floppy disk drive.
Installing Windows 10 TP proved to be a straight-forward task. Load it on a USB drive containing Windows 10 (you can use this Windows 7 USB drive tool)
and voila! The whole process didn't take longer than on any other
recent machine we loaded with Windows 10. Well done to Microsoft for
maintaining compatibility with hardware that's more than a decade old.
Once
in, I wired the computer and downloaded the latest drivers, still no
hiccups. Even with less than 1GB of RAM (64MB of it is shared with the
video subsystem), Windows 10 is surprisingly nice to use, which bodes
well for anyone looking to get it running on an old computer.
![]() |
The innards of the beast |
I deliberately chose not to run benchmarks and/or making it
perform any intensive task (getting Chrome to run 40 tabs for example).
Next, I halved the system memory to 512MB (448MB available) and then
down to 256MB (192GB available). 256MB RAM is what the first Raspberry Pi and the iPhone 3GS (launched in 2009) ran on.
The
system booted without any issue which was pretty much unexpected given
that previous versions of Windows (Vista and Windows 7) would often
struggle to boot to the login window in less than one minute.
There
was no noticeable lag running the mouse cursor around, nothing like
what I experienced on Windows Vista or early previews of Windows 7.
However, it took a whopping 41 seconds between double clicking on a
folder to open it and Windows Explorer actually showing the content of
that folder.
![]() |
Memory usage is pretty much at its maximum. |
To be honest though, I am actually flabbergasted that Windows 10
Technical Preview runs at all on such antiquated hardware. Being able to
do so is a genuinely impressive tasks given the breadth and depth of
products, SKUs and components that Microsoft and its partners have to
deal with.
Source: www.techradar.com
No comments:
Post a Comment